Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
About
Trust region methods rigorously enabled reinforcement learning (RL) agents to learn monotonically improving policies, leading to superior performance on a variety of tasks. Unfortunately, when it comes to multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), the property of monotonic improvement may not simply apply; this is because agents, even in cooperative games, could have conflicting directions of policy updates. As a result, achieving a guaranteed improvement on the joint policy where each agent acts individually remains an open challenge. In this paper, we extend the theory of trust region learning to MARL. Central to our findings are the multi-agent advantage decomposition lemma and the sequential policy update scheme. Based on these, we develop Heterogeneous-Agent Trust Region Policy Optimisation (HATPRO) and Heterogeneous-Agent Proximal Policy Optimisation (HAPPO) algorithms. Unlike many existing MARL algorithms, HATRPO/HAPPO do not need agents to share parameters, nor do they need any restrictive assumptions on decomposibility of the joint value function. Most importantly, we justify in theory the monotonic improvement property of HATRPO/HAPPO. We evaluate the proposed methods on a series of Multi-Agent MuJoCo and StarCraftII tasks. Results show that HATRPO and HAPPO significantly outperform strong baselines such as IPPO, MAPPO and MADDPG on all tested tasks, therefore establishing a new state of the art.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-Agent Cooperative Control | SMAC 3m v1 (train) | Win Rate100 | 12 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC 1c3s5z (test) | Test Win Rate97.5 | 10 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC-Hard 10m_vs_11m | Win Rate57.6 | 7 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC Hard 3s5z | Win Rate0.681 | 7 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC-Hard 2c_vs_64zg | Win Rate0.733 | 7 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC-Hard (3m) | Win Rate37.3 | 7 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC-Hard 2s_vs_1sc | Win Rate0.00e+0 | 7 | |
| Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning | SMAC-Hard 3s_vs_4z | Win Rate14.4 | 7 | |
| 8m | SMAC | Win Rate97.5 | 6 | |
| Multi-Agent Cooperative Control | SMAC 8m v1 (train) | Win Rate97.5 | 6 |