Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

About

We apply preference modeling and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to finetune language models to act as helpful and harmless assistants. We find this alignment training improves performance on almost all NLP evaluations, and is fully compatible with training for specialized skills such as python coding and summarization. We explore an iterated online mode of training, where preference models and RL policies are updated on a weekly cadence with fresh human feedback data, efficiently improving our datasets and models. Finally, we investigate the robustness of RLHF training, and identify a roughly linear relation between the RL reward and the square root of the KL divergence between the policy and its initialization. Alongside our main results, we perform peripheral analyses on calibration, competing objectives, and the use of OOD detection, compare our models with human writers, and provide samples from our models using prompts appearing in recent related work.

Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Nicholas Joseph, Saurav Kadavath, Jackson Kernion, Tom Conerly, Sheer El-Showk, Nelson Elhage, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Tristan Hume, Scott Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Liane Lovitt, Neel Nanda, Catherine Olsson, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Sam McCandlish, Chris Olah, Ben Mann, Jared Kaplan• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Commonsense ReasoningHellaSwag
HellaSwag Accuracy77.4
711
Multiple-choice Question AnsweringARC Easy
Accuracy84.4
257
Multiple-choice Question AnsweringMMLU
Accuracy71.1
210
Jailbreak DefensePAIR
ASR68
97
Truthful Question AnsweringTruthfulQA MC2
MC2 Accuracy45.5
51
PersonalizationCommunity Alignment (CA)
Personalization Win-Rate90.17
45
PersonalizationPRISM
Personalization Win Rate80.07
45
PersonalizationMulti-Bench (MB)
Win Rate90.48
45
Multiple-choice Question AnsweringBIG-bench HHH Eval
Overall Score86
42
Open-endedAlpacaEval
Win Rate vs Davinci-00321.12
40
Showing 10 of 38 rows

Other info

Follow for update