Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Incorporating Semi-Supervised and Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Boosting Full Reference Image Quality Assessment

About

Full-reference (FR) image quality assessment (IQA) evaluates the visual quality of a distorted image by measuring its perceptual difference with pristine-quality reference, and has been widely used in low-level vision tasks. Pairwise labeled data with mean opinion score (MOS) are required in training FR-IQA model, but is time-consuming and cumbersome to collect. In contrast, unlabeled data can be easily collected from an image degradation or restoration process, making it encouraging to exploit unlabeled training data to boost FR-IQA performance. Moreover, due to the distribution inconsistency between labeled and unlabeled data, outliers may occur in unlabeled data, further increasing the training difficulty. In this paper, we suggest to incorporate semi-supervised and positive-unlabeled (PU) learning for exploiting unlabeled data while mitigating the adverse effect of outliers. Particularly, by treating all labeled data as positive samples, PU learning is leveraged to identify negative samples (i.e., outliers) from unlabeled data. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is further deployed to exploit positive unlabeled data by dynamically generating pseudo-MOS. We adopt a dual-branch network including reference and distortion branches. Furthermore, spatial attention is introduced in the reference branch to concentrate more on the informative regions, and sliced Wasserstein distance is used for robust difference map computation to address the misalignment issues caused by images recovered by GAN models. Extensive experiments show that our method performs favorably against state-of-the-arts on the benchmark datasets PIPAL, KADID-10k, TID2013, LIVE and CSIQ.

Yue Cao, Zhaolin Wan, Dongwei Ren, Zifei Yan, Wangmeng Zuo• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image Quality AssessmentTID 2013 (test)
Mean SRCC0.94
124
Image Quality AssessmentCSIQ (test)
SRCC0.977
103
Image Quality AssessmentKADID-10k (test)
SRCC0.961
91
Image Quality EstimationLIVE (test)
PCC0.983
43
Image Quality AssessmentPIPAL NTIRE 2021 IQA Challenge (test)
PLCC0.877
32
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update