Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

HIH: Towards More Accurate Face Alignment via Heatmap in Heatmap

About

Heatmap-based regression overcomes the lack of spatial and contextual information of direct coordinate regression, and has revolutionized the task of face alignment. Yet it suffers from quantization errors caused by neglecting subpixel coordinates in image resizing and network downsampling. In this paper, we first quantitatively analyze the quantization error on benchmarks, which accounts for more than 1/3 of the whole prediction errors for state-of-the-art methods. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel Heatmap In Heatmap(HIH) representation and a coordinate soft-classification (CSC) method, which are seamlessly integrated into the classic hourglass network. The HIH representation utilizes nested heatmaps to jointly represent the coordinate label: one heatmap called integer heatmap stands for the integer coordinate, and the other heatmap named decimal heatmap represents the subpixel coordinate. The range of a decimal heatmap makes up one pixel in the corresponding integer heatmap. Besides, we transfer the offset regression problem to an interval classification task, and CSC regards the confidence of the pixel as the probability of the interval. Meanwhile, CSC applying the distribution loss leverage the soft labels generated from the Gaussian distribution function to guide the offset heatmap training, which makes it easier to learn the distribution of coordinate offsets. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmark datasets demonstrate that our HIH can achieve state-of-the-art results. In particular, our HIH reaches 4.08 NME (Normalized Mean Error) on WFLW, and 3.21 on COFW, which exceeds previous methods by a significant margin.

Xing Lan, Qinghao Hu, Qiang Chen, Jian Xue, Jian Cheng• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Facial Landmark Detection300-W (Common)
NME2.65
180
Facial Landmark Detection300-W (Fullset)
Mean Error (%)3.09
174
Facial Landmark Detection300W (Challenging)
NME4.89
159
Face AlignmentWFLW (test)
NME (%) (Testset)4.08
144
Facial Landmark DetectionWFLW (test)
Mean Error (ME) - All4.08
122
Facial Landmark DetectionCOFW (test)
NME0.0321
93
Face AlignmentCOFW (test)--
72
Facial Landmark DetectionWFLW (Full)
NME (%)4.08
65
Facial Landmark Detection300W
NME3.09
52
Facial Landmark DetectionWFLW Pose
Mean Error (%)7.2
50
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update