Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Boundary Smoothing for Named Entity Recognition

About

Neural named entity recognition (NER) models may easily encounter the over-confidence issue, which degrades the performance and calibration. Inspired by label smoothing and driven by the ambiguity of boundary annotation in NER engineering, we propose boundary smoothing as a regularization technique for span-based neural NER models. It re-assigns entity probabilities from annotated spans to the surrounding ones. Built on a simple but strong baseline, our model achieves results better than or competitive with previous state-of-the-art systems on eight well-known NER benchmarks. Further empirical analysis suggests that boundary smoothing effectively mitigates over-confidence, improves model calibration, and brings flatter neural minima and more smoothed loss landscapes.

Enwei Zhu, Jinpeng Li• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Named Entity RecognitionCoNLL 2003 (test)
F1 Score93.77
539
Nested Named Entity RecognitionACE 2004 (test)
F1 Score87.98
166
Nested Named Entity RecognitionACE 2005 (test)
F1 Score87.2
153
Named Entity RecognitionOntoNotes 5.0 (test)
F1 Score91.74
90
Named Entity RecognitionACE 2005 (test)
F1 Score87.15
58
Named Entity RecognitionRESUME
F1 Score96.66
52
Named Entity RecognitionACE04 (test)
F1 Score88.52
36
Named Entity RecognitionWeiboNER
F1 Score72.66
27
Named Entity RecognitionChinese OntoNotes 4.0 (test)
F1 Score82.83
19
Named Entity RecognitionChinese MSRA (test)
F1 Score96.26
18
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update