Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Training
About
Real-world datasets often encode stereotypes and societal biases. Such biases can be implicitly captured by trained models, leading to biased predictions and exacerbating existing societal preconceptions. Existing debiasing methods, such as adversarial training and removing protected information from representations, have been shown to reduce bias. However, a disconnect between fairness criteria and training objectives makes it difficult to reason theoretically about the effectiveness of different techniques. In this work, we propose two novel training objectives which directly optimise for the widely-used criterion of {\it equal opportunity}, and show that they are effective in reducing bias while maintaining high performance over two classification tasks.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| multi target-group identification | HateXplain (test) | African Group BA75.92 | 3 | |
| Target Detection | MHS Corpus (test) | Performance (Asian)82.51 | 3 | |
| Multi-Label Classification | MHS Corpus | Macro Precision54.18 | 3 | |
| Multi-Label Classification | HateXplain | Precision (macro)0.5789 | 3 | |
| Multi-Label Classification | MHS Corpus (test) | Hamming Loss12.1 | 3 | |
| Multi-Label Classification | HateXplain (test) | Hamming Loss7.22 | 3 |