Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Function

About

Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) aggregates the source votes of multiple weak supervision sources into probabilistic training labels, which are in turn used to train an end model. With its increasing popularity, it is critical to have some tool for users to understand the influence of each component (e.g., the source vote or training data) in the pipeline and interpret the end model behavior. To achieve this, we build on Influence Function (IF) and propose source-aware IF, which leverages the generation process of the probabilistic labels to decompose the end model's training objective and then calculate the influence associated with each (data, source, class) tuple. These primitive influence score can then be used to estimate the influence of individual component of PWS, such as source vote, supervision source, and training data. On datasets of diverse domains, we demonstrate multiple use cases: (1) interpreting incorrect predictions from multiple angles that reveals insights for debugging the PWS pipeline, (2) identifying mislabeling of sources with a gain of 9%-37% over baselines, and (3) improving the end model's generalization performance by removing harmful components in the training objective (13%-24% better than ordinary IF).

Jieyu Zhang, Haonan Wang, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Alexander Ratner• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Text ClassificationYelp (test)--
55
LF Mislabeling IdentificationIMDB
AP79.9
38
LF Mislabeling IdentificationCensus
AP86.8
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationPW
AP91.1
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationSpambase
AP92.7
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationYelp
AP0.922
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationDN quickdraw
AP87.9
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationDN painting
AP91.2
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationDN clipart
AP88
32
LF Mislabeling IdentificationMushroom
AP95.6
32
Showing 10 of 42 rows

Other info

Follow for update