Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformers

About

With the rise of Transformers as the standard for language processing, and their advancements in computer vision, there has been a corresponding growth in parameter size and amounts of training data. Many have come to believe that because of this, transformers are not suitable for small sets of data. This trend leads to concerns such as: limited availability of data in certain scientific domains and the exclusion of those with limited resource from research in the field. In this paper, we aim to present an approach for small-scale learning by introducing Compact Transformers. We show for the first time that with the right size, convolutional tokenization, transformers can avoid overfitting and outperform state-of-the-art CNNs on small datasets. Our models are flexible in terms of model size, and can have as little as 0.28M parameters while achieving competitive results. Our best model can reach 98% accuracy when training from scratch on CIFAR-10 with only 3.7M parameters, which is a significant improvement in data-efficiency over previous Transformer based models being over 10x smaller than other transformers and is 15% the size of ResNet50 while achieving similar performance. CCT also outperforms many modern CNN based approaches, and even some recent NAS-based approaches. Additionally, we obtain a new SOTA result on Flowers-102 with 99.76% top-1 accuracy, and improve upon the existing baseline on ImageNet (82.71% accuracy with 29% as many parameters as ViT), as well as NLP tasks. Our simple and compact design for transformers makes them more feasible to study for those with limited computing resources and/or dealing with small datasets, while extending existing research efforts in data efficient transformers. Our code and pre-trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/SHI-Labs/Compact-Transformers.

Ali Hassani, Steven Walton, Nikhil Shah, Abulikemu Abuduweili, Jiachen Li, Humphrey Shi• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy76.67
3518
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy93.65
3381
Image ClassificationMNIST (test)
Accuracy99.82
894
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (val)--
776
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100--
691
Image ClassificationFashion MNIST (test)
Accuracy95.56
592
Image ClassificationTinyImageNet (test)
Accuracy48.77
440
Image ClassificationMNIST
Accuracy99.45
398
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (val)
Top-1 Accuracy98
370
Image ClassificationTiny ImageNet (test)
Accuracy61.07
362
Showing 10 of 40 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update