Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Model Adaptation: Historical Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Data

About

Unsupervised domain adaptation aims to align a labeled source domain and an unlabeled target domain, but it requires to access the source data which often raises concerns in data privacy, data portability and data transmission efficiency. We study unsupervised model adaptation (UMA), or called Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Data, an alternative setting that aims to adapt source-trained models towards target distributions without accessing source data. To this end, we design an innovative historical contrastive learning (HCL) technique that exploits historical source hypothesis to make up for the absence of source data in UMA. HCL addresses the UMA challenge from two perspectives. First, it introduces historical contrastive instance discrimination (HCID) that learns from target samples by contrasting their embeddings which are generated by the currently adapted model and the historical models. With the historical models, HCID encourages UMA to learn instance-discriminative target representations while preserving the source hypothesis. Second, it introduces historical contrastive category discrimination (HCCD) that pseudo-labels target samples to learn category-discriminative target representations. Specifically, HCCD re-weights pseudo labels according to their prediction consistency across the current and historical models. Extensive experiments show that HCL outperforms and state-of-the-art methods consistently across a variety of visual tasks and setups.

Jiaxing Huang, Dayan Guan, Aoran Xiao, Shijian Lu• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semantic segmentationCityscapes (test)
mIoU40.3
1145
Semantic segmentationGTA5 → Cityscapes (val)
mIoU49.3
533
Semantic segmentationSYNTHIA to Cityscapes (val)
Rider IoU29.4
435
Image ClassificationOffice-31
Average Accuracy90.6
261
Object DetectionCityscapes to Foggy Cityscapes (test)
mAP39.7
196
Domain AdaptationOffice-31
Accuracy (A -> W)92.5
156
Semantic segmentationGTA5 to Cityscapes (test)
mIoU48.1
151
Image ClassificationOffice-Home
Average Accuracy72.6
142
Object DetectionWatercolor2k (test)--
113
Object DetectionFoggy Cityscapes (test)
mAP (Mean Average Precision)34.6
108
Showing 10 of 42 rows

Other info

Follow for update