Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labels

About

Label smoothing (LS) is an arising learning paradigm that uses the positively weighted average of both the hard training labels and uniformly distributed soft labels. It was shown that LS serves as a regularizer for training data with hard labels and therefore improves the generalization of the model. Later it was reported LS even helps with improving robustness when learning with noisy labels. However, we observed that the advantage of LS vanishes when we operate in a high label noise regime. Intuitively speaking, this is due to the increased entropy of $\mathbb{P}(\text{noisy label}|X)$ when the noise rate is high, in which case, further applying LS tends to "over-smooth" the estimated posterior. We proceeded to discover that several learning-with-noisy-labels solutions in the literature instead relate more closely to negative/not label smoothing (NLS), which acts counter to LS and defines as using a negative weight to combine the hard and soft labels! We provide understandings for the properties of LS and NLS when learning with noisy labels. Among other established properties, we theoretically show NLS is considered more beneficial when the label noise rates are high. We provide extensive experimental results on multiple benchmarks to support our findings too. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/negative-label-smoothing.

Jiaheng Wei, Hangyu Liu, Tongliang Liu, Gang Niu, Masashi Sugiyama, Yang Liu• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationClothing1M (test)
Accuracy74.24
546
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (Worst)
Accuracy82.99
78
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 Symmetric Noise (test)
Accuracy58.47
76
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (Aggregate)
Accuracy91.97
74
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Symmetric Noise (test)
Test Accuracy (Overall)93.55
64
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (Random 1)
Accuracy90.29
36
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (Random 2)
Accuracy90.37
34
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (Random 3)
Accuracy90.13
34
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Asymmetric Noise (test)--
33
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (test)
Accuracy (Random 1)90.29
31
Showing 10 of 30 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update