Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Training OOD Detectors in their Natural Habitats

About

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is important for machine learning models deployed in the wild. Recent methods use auxiliary outlier data to regularize the model for improved OOD detection. However, these approaches make a strong distributional assumption that the auxiliary outlier data is completely separable from the in-distribution (ID) data. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that leverages wild mixture data, which naturally consists of both ID and OOD samples. Such wild data is abundant and arises freely upon deploying a machine learning classifier in their natural habitats. Our key idea is to formulate a constrained optimization problem and to show how to tractably solve it. Our learning objective maximizes the OOD detection rate, subject to constraints on the classification error of ID data and on the OOD error rate of ID examples. We extensively evaluate our approach on common OOD detection tasks and demonstrate superior performance.

Julian Katz-Samuels, Julia Nakhleh, Robert Nowak, Yixuan Li• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10 (IND) SVHN (OOD)
AUROC0.9991
152
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10 (ID) vs Places 365 (OOD)
AUROC98.05
131
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10
AUROC97.32
121
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-100 SVHN in-distribution out-of-distribution (test)
AUROC86.76
111
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-100
AUROC92.68
107
OOD DetectionLSUN-Resize (OOD) with CIFAR-10 (ID) (test)
FPR@950.11
84
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10 IND LSUN C OOD
AUROC99.14
74
Out-of-Distribution Detection and GeneralizationCIFAR-10 ID LSUN-C semantic OOD & CIFAR-10-C covariate OOD
OOD Accuracy78.75
74
OOD DetectionCIFAR-10 Average OOD ID (test)
FPR@953.4
54
Out-of-Distribution Detection and GeneralizationCIFAR-10 ID Textures semantic OOD CIFAR-10-C covariate OOD
OOD Accuracy83.14
38
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update