Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning Where To Look -- Generative NAS is Surprisingly Efficient

About

The efficient, automated search for well-performing neural architectures (NAS) has drawn increasing attention in the recent past. Thereby, the predominant research objective is to reduce the necessity of costly evaluations of neural architectures while efficiently exploring large search spaces. To this aim, surrogate models embed architectures in a latent space and predict their performance, while generative models for neural architectures enable optimization-based search within the latent space the generator draws from. Both, surrogate and generative models, have the aim of facilitating query-efficient search in a well-structured latent space. In this paper, we further improve the trade-off between query-efficiency and promising architecture generation by leveraging advantages from both, efficient surrogate models and generative design. To this end, we propose a generative model, paired with a surrogate predictor, that iteratively learns to generate samples from increasingly promising latent subspaces. This approach leads to very effective and efficient architecture search, while keeping the query amount low. In addition, our approach allows in a straightforward manner to jointly optimize for multiple objectives such as accuracy and hardware latency. We show the benefit of this approach not only w.r.t. the optimization of architectures for highest classification accuracy but also in the context of hardware constraints and outperform state-of-the-art methods on several NAS benchmarks for single and multiple objectives. We also achieve state-of-the-art performance on ImageNet. The code is available at http://github.com/jovitalukasik/AG-Net .

Jovita Lukasik, Steffen Jung, Margret Keuper• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet (val)--
188
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201 ImageNet-16-120 (test)
Accuracy46.43
86
Neural Architecture SearchCIFAR-10 NAS-Bench-201 (val)
Accuracy91.61
86
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy94.37
85
Neural Architecture SearchImageNet16-120 NAS-Bench-201 (val)
Accuracy46.73
79
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy73.51
78
Neural Architecture SearchCIFAR-100 NAS-Bench-201 (val)
Accuracy73.49
67
Neural Architecture SearchHW-NAS-Bench (val)
Validation Accuracy46.4
36
Neural Architecture SearchHW-NAS-Bench Edge GPU
Accuracy46.8
28
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-101 1.0 (test)
Test Accuracy0.9418
22
Showing 10 of 22 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update