Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

On Multi-Domain Long-Tailed Recognition, Imbalanced Domain Generalization and Beyond

About

Real-world data often exhibit imbalanced label distributions. Existing studies on data imbalance focus on single-domain settings, i.e., samples are from the same data distribution. However, natural data can originate from distinct domains, where a minority class in one domain could have abundant instances from other domains. We formalize the task of Multi-Domain Long-Tailed Recognition (MDLT), which learns from multi-domain imbalanced data, addresses label imbalance, domain shift, and divergent label distributions across domains, and generalizes to all domain-class pairs. We first develop the domain-class transferability graph, and show that such transferability governs the success of learning in MDLT. We then propose BoDA, a theoretically grounded learning strategy that tracks the upper bound of transferability statistics, and ensures balanced alignment and calibration across imbalanced domain-class distributions. We curate five MDLT benchmarks based on widely-used multi-domain datasets, and compare BoDA to twenty algorithms that span different learning strategies. Extensive and rigorous experiments verify the superior performance of BoDA. Further, as a byproduct, BoDA establishes new state-of-the-art on Domain Generalization benchmarks, highlighting the importance of addressing data imbalance across domains, which can be crucial for improving generalization to unseen domains. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/YyzHarry/multi-domain-imbalance.

Yuzhe Yang, Hao Wang, Dina Katabi• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationPACS
Overall Average Accuracy65.7
230
Diabetic Retinopathy ClassificationDEEPDR (test)
Accuracy0.502
30
Image ClassificationPACS TotalHeavyTail setting (test)
Overall Accuracy0.741
24
Image ClassificationVLCS
Average Accuracy58.2
24
Image ClassificationOfficeHome TotalHeavyTail setting (test)
Avg Accuracy47.1
24
Image ClassificationOfficeHome
Average Accuracy53.5
24
Image ClassificationVLCS GINIDG setting (test)
Average Accuracy76.3
24
Diabetic Retinopathy GradingAPTOS ESDG (test)
AUC67.6
24
Image ClassificationVLCS TotalHeavyTail setting (test)
Average Accuracy73
24
Diabetic Retinopathy GradingFGADR ESDG (test)
AUC57.1
24
Showing 10 of 26 rows

Other info

Follow for update