Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels

About

A complementary label (CL) simply indicates an incorrect class of an example, but learning with CLs results in multi-class classifiers that can predict the correct class. Unfortunately, the problem setting only allows a single CL for each example, which notably limits its potential since our labelers may easily identify multiple CLs (MCLs) to one example. In this paper, we propose a novel problem setting to allow MCLs for each example and two ways for learning with MCLs. In the first way, we design two wrappers that decompose MCLs into many single CLs, so that we could use any method for learning with CLs. However, the supervision information that MCLs hold is conceptually diluted after decomposition. Thus, in the second way, we derive an unbiased risk estimator; minimizing it processes each set of MCLs as a whole and possesses an estimation error bound. We further improve the second way into minimizing properly chosen upper bounds. Experiments show that the former way works well for learning with MCLs but the latter is even better.

Lei Feng, Takuo Kaneko, Bo Han, Gang Niu, Bo An, Masashi Sugiyama• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Partial-Label LearningCIFAR100 LT
Accuracy49.92
48
Partial-Label LearningCIFAR10-LT
Accuracy61.13
48
Partial-Label Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy79.97
22
Partial-Label Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy49.17
22
Image ClassificationSVHN (test)
Clean Accuracy19.6
22
Image ClassificationMNIST (test)
Accuracy (Natural)97.16
15
Image ClassificationKuzushiji (test)
Accuracy (Natural)32.66
10
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 (test)
Natural Accuracy11.7
10
Partial-Label LearningCUB-200
Accuracy22.07
7
Image ClassificationKuzushiji MCLs setting (test)
Natural Accuracy77.83
5
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update