Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark

About

Given a long list of anomaly detection algorithms developed in the last few decades, how do they perform with regard to (i) varying levels of supervision, (ii) different types of anomalies, and (iii) noisy and corrupted data? In this work, we answer these key questions by conducting (to our best knowledge) the most comprehensive anomaly detection benchmark with 30 algorithms on 57 benchmark datasets, named ADBench. Our extensive experiments (98,436 in total) identify meaningful insights into the role of supervision and anomaly types, and unlock future directions for researchers in algorithm selection and design. With ADBench, researchers can easily conduct comprehensive and fair evaluations for newly proposed methods on the datasets (including our contributed ones from natural language and computer vision domains) against the existing baselines. To foster accessibility and reproducibility, we fully open-source ADBench and the corresponding results.

Songqiao Han, Xiyang Hu, Hailiang Huang, Mingqi Jiang, Yue Zhao• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Anomaly DetectionWBC
ROCAUC99.5
87
Tabular Anomaly Detectionpima
AUC ROC0.734
53
Tabular Anomaly DetectionVertebral
AUC-ROC53.2
33
Anomaly DetectionCardiotocography
AUC-ROC0.781
28
Anomaly DetectionLympho
AUC-ROC99.8
19
Anomaly DetectionHepatitis
AUC ROC0.82
19
Outlier DetectionBreastW
AUC-ROC99.7
10
Anomaly Detectioncardio
ROC0.956
3
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update