Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models

About

Large pre-trained vision-language models like CLIP have shown great potential in learning representations that are transferable across a wide range of downstream tasks. Different from the traditional representation learning that is based mostly on discretized labels, vision-language pre-training aligns images and texts in a common feature space, which allows zero-shot transfer to a downstream task via prompting, i.e., classification weights are synthesized from natural language describing classes of interest. In this work, we show that a major challenge for deploying such models in practice is prompt engineering, which requires domain expertise and is extremely time-consuming -- one needs to spend a significant amount of time on words tuning since a slight change in wording could have a huge impact on performance. Inspired by recent advances in prompt learning research in natural language processing (NLP), we propose Context Optimization (CoOp), a simple approach specifically for adapting CLIP-like vision-language models for downstream image recognition. Concretely, CoOp models a prompt's context words with learnable vectors while the entire pre-trained parameters are kept fixed. To handle different image recognition tasks, we provide two implementations of CoOp: unified context and class-specific context. Through extensive experiments on 11 datasets, we demonstrate that CoOp requires as few as one or two shots to beat hand-crafted prompts with a decent margin and is able to gain significant improvements over prompt engineering with more shots, e.g., with 16 shots the average gain is around 15% (with the highest reaching over 45%). Despite being a learning-based approach, CoOp achieves superb domain generalization performance compared with the zero-shot model using hand-crafted prompts.

Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, Ziwei Liu• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy89.76
3381
Image ClassificationImageNet-1k (val)--
1453
Person Re-IdentificationDuke MTMC-reID (test)
Rank-133.7
1018
Image ClassificationImageNet 1k (test)
Top-1 Accuracy71.9
798
Image ClassificationImageNet A
Top-1 Acc49.71
553
Image ClassificationImageNet-1K
Top-1 Acc71.51
524
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10--
507
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy84.93
497
Image ClassificationFood-101
Accuracy88.33
494
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy69.87
487
Showing 10 of 670 rows
...

Other info

Code

Follow for update