Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routing
About
Sparsely-activated Mixture-of-experts (MoE) models allow the number of parameters to greatly increase while keeping the amount of computation for a given token or a given sample unchanged. However, a poor expert routing strategy (e.g. one resulting in load imbalance) can cause certain experts to be under-trained, leading to an expert being under or over-specialized. Prior work allocates a fixed number of experts to each token using a top-k function regardless of the relative importance of different tokens. To address this, we propose a heterogeneous mixture-of-experts employing an expert choice method. Instead of letting tokens select the top-k experts, we have experts selecting the top-k tokens. As a result, each token can be routed to a variable number of experts and each expert can have a fixed bucket size. We systematically study pre-training speedups using the same computational resources of the Switch Transformer top-1 and GShard top-2 gating of prior work and find that our method improves training convergence time by more than 2x. For the same computational cost, our method demonstrates higher performance in fine-tuning 11 selected tasks in the GLUE and SuperGLUE benchmarks. For a smaller activation cost, our method outperforms the T5 dense model in 7 out of the 11 tasks.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commonsense Reasoning | HellaSwag | Accuracy29.14 | 1896 | |
| Question Answering | ARC Challenge | Accuracy18.86 | 906 | |
| Commonsense Reasoning | PIQA | Accuracy61.92 | 757 | |
| Language Modeling | WikiText-103 (test) | Perplexity23.3 | 703 | |
| Question Answering | ARC-E | Accuracy42.97 | 523 | |
| Language Modeling | LAMBADA | Accuracy29.26 | 412 | |
| Image Classification | Oxford-IIIT Pets | Accuracy93.69 | 378 | |
| Reading Comprehension | BoolQ | Accuracy60.21 | 279 | |
| Intent Classification | Banking77 | Accuracy75.6 | 260 | |
| Image Classification | SVHN | Top-1 Accuracy95 | 186 |