Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Rethinking and Scaling Up Graph Contrastive Learning: An Extremely Efficient Approach with Group Discrimination

About

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) alleviates the heavy reliance on label information for graph representation learning (GRL) via self-supervised learning schemes. The core idea is to learn by maximising mutual information for similar instances, which requires similarity computation between two node instances. However, GCL is inefficient in both time and memory consumption. In addition, GCL normally requires a large number of training epochs to be well-trained on large-scale datasets. Inspired by an observation of a technical defect (i.e., inappropriate usage of Sigmoid function) commonly used in two representative GCL works, DGI and MVGRL, we revisit GCL and introduce a new learning paradigm for self-supervised graph representation learning, namely, Group Discrimination (GD), and propose a novel GD-based method called Graph Group Discrimination (GGD). Instead of similarity computation, GGD directly discriminates two groups of node samples with a very simple binary cross-entropy loss. In addition, GGD requires much fewer training epochs to obtain competitive performance compared with GCL methods on large-scale datasets. These two advantages endow GGD with very efficient property. Extensive experiments show that GGD outperforms state-of-the-art self-supervised methods on eight datasets. In particular, GGD can be trained in 0.18 seconds (6.44 seconds including data preprocessing) on ogbn-arxiv, which is orders of magnitude (10,000+) faster than GCL baselines while consuming much less memory. Trained with 9 hours on ogbn-papers100M with billion edges, GGD outperforms its GCL counterparts in both accuracy and efficiency.

Yizhen Zheng, Shirui Pan, Vincent Cs Lee, Yu Zheng, Philip S. Yu• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy83.9
1215
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy73.6
931
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy87.21
861
Node ClassificationCiteseer (test)
Accuracy0.7925
824
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy81.3
819
Node ClassificationPubMed (test)
Accuracy85.38
546
Node Classificationogbn-arxiv (test)
Accuracy71.6
433
Node ClassificationChameleon (test)
Mean Accuracy57.64
297
Node ClassificationCornell (test)
Mean Accuracy80.33
274
Node ClassificationTexas (test)
Mean Accuracy82.62
269
Showing 10 of 40 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update