MGNNI: Multiscale Graph Neural Networks with Implicit Layers
About
Recently, implicit graph neural networks (GNNs) have been proposed to capture long-range dependencies in underlying graphs. In this paper, we introduce and justify two weaknesses of implicit GNNs: the constrained expressiveness due to their limited effective range for capturing long-range dependencies, and their lack of ability to capture multiscale information on graphs at multiple resolutions. To show the limited effective range of previous implicit GNNs, We first provide a theoretical analysis and point out the intrinsic relationship between the effective range and the convergence of iterative equations used in these models. To mitigate the mentioned weaknesses, we propose a multiscale graph neural network with implicit layers (MGNNI) which is able to model multiscale structures on graphs and has an expanded effective range for capturing long-range dependencies. We conduct comprehensive experiments for both node classification and graph classification to show that MGNNI outperforms representative baselines and has a better ability for multiscale modeling and capturing of long-range dependencies.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graph Classification | PROTEINS | Accuracy79.2 | 742 | |
| Node Classification | Chameleon | Accuracy63.93 | 549 | |
| Node Classification | Squirrel | Accuracy54.5 | 500 | |
| Graph Classification | NCI1 | Accuracy78.9 | 460 | |
| Node Classification | Cornell | Accuracy85.95 | 426 | |
| Node Classification | Wisconsin | Accuracy86.67 | 410 | |
| Node Classification | Texas | Accuracy0.8486 | 410 | |
| Graph Classification | IMDB-M | Accuracy53.5 | 218 | |
| Graph Classification | MUTAG (10-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy91.9 | 206 | |
| Node Classification | PPI (test) | F1 (micro)0.987 | 126 |