Pareto Set Learning for Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization
About
Expensive multi-objective optimization problems can be found in many real-world applications, where their objective function evaluations involve expensive computations or physical experiments. It is desirable to obtain an approximate Pareto front with a limited evaluation budget. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) has been widely used for finding a finite set of Pareto optimal solutions. However, it is well-known that the whole Pareto set is on a continuous manifold and can contain infinite solutions. The structural properties of the Pareto set are not well exploited in existing MOBO methods, and the finite-set approximation may not contain the most preferred solution(s) for decision-makers. This paper develops a novel learning-based method to approximate the whole Pareto set for MOBO, which generalizes the decomposition-based multi-objective optimization algorithm (MOEA/D) from finite populations to models. We design a simple and powerful acquisition search method based on the learned Pareto set, which naturally supports batch evaluation. In addition, with our proposed model, decision-makers can readily explore any trade-off area in the approximate Pareto set for flexible decision-making. This work represents the first attempt to model the Pareto set for expensive multi-objective optimization. Experimental results on different synthetic and real-world problems demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-Objective Optimization | DTLZ1 | Hypervolume (HV)3.00e+4 | 23 | |
| Multi-Objective Optimization | DTLZ2 | Hypervolume (HV)2.38 | 23 | |
| Multi-Objective Optimization | DTLZ3 | HV2.31e+4 | 19 | |
| Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization | UAV | Hypervolume40.3 | 10 | |
| Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization | LaMP | Hypervolume0.542 | 10 | |
| Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization | solar | Hypervolume0.596 | 10 | |
| Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization | MAGNETIC | Hypervolume0.0742 | 10 | |
| Inverse Model Generalization | DTLZ-1 | Hypervolume2.82e+4 | 5 | |
| Inverse Model Generalization | DTLZ-3 | Hypervolume2.39e+4 | 5 | |
| Inverse Model Generalization | DTLZ-2 | Hypervolume1.9 | 5 |