Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Pareto Set Learning for Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization

About

Expensive multi-objective optimization problems can be found in many real-world applications, where their objective function evaluations involve expensive computations or physical experiments. It is desirable to obtain an approximate Pareto front with a limited evaluation budget. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) has been widely used for finding a finite set of Pareto optimal solutions. However, it is well-known that the whole Pareto set is on a continuous manifold and can contain infinite solutions. The structural properties of the Pareto set are not well exploited in existing MOBO methods, and the finite-set approximation may not contain the most preferred solution(s) for decision-makers. This paper develops a novel learning-based method to approximate the whole Pareto set for MOBO, which generalizes the decomposition-based multi-objective optimization algorithm (MOEA/D) from finite populations to models. We design a simple and powerful acquisition search method based on the learned Pareto set, which naturally supports batch evaluation. In addition, with our proposed model, decision-makers can readily explore any trade-off area in the approximate Pareto set for flexible decision-making. This work represents the first attempt to model the Pareto set for expensive multi-objective optimization. Experimental results on different synthetic and real-world problems demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Xi Lin, Zhiyuan Yang, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Qingfu Zhang• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-Objective OptimizationDTLZ1
Hypervolume (HV)3.00e+4
23
Multi-Objective OptimizationDTLZ2
Hypervolume (HV)2.38
23
Multi-Objective OptimizationDTLZ3
HV2.31e+4
19
Multi-Objective Bayesian OptimizationUAV
Hypervolume40.3
10
Multi-Objective Bayesian OptimizationLaMP
Hypervolume0.542
10
Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationsolar
Hypervolume0.596
10
Multi-Objective Bayesian OptimizationMAGNETIC
Hypervolume0.0742
10
Inverse Model GeneralizationDTLZ-1
Hypervolume2.82e+4
5
Inverse Model GeneralizationDTLZ-3
Hypervolume2.39e+4
5
Inverse Model GeneralizationDTLZ-2
Hypervolume1.9
5
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update