Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Bootstrapping the Relationship Between Images and Their Clean and Noisy Labels

About

Many state-of-the-art noisy-label learning methods rely on learning mechanisms that estimate the samples' clean labels during training and discard their original noisy labels. However, this approach prevents the learning of the relationship between images, noisy labels and clean labels, which has been shown to be useful when dealing with instance-dependent label noise problems. Furthermore, methods that do aim to learn this relationship require cleanly annotated subsets of data, as well as distillation or multi-faceted models for training. In this paper, we propose a new training algorithm that relies on a simple model to learn the relationship between clean and noisy labels without the need for a cleanly labelled subset of data. Our algorithm follows a 3-stage process, namely: 1) self-supervised pre-training followed by an early-stopping training of the classifier to confidently predict clean labels for a subset of the training set; 2) use the clean set from stage (1) to bootstrap the relationship between images, noisy labels and clean labels, which we exploit for effective relabelling of the remaining training set using semi-supervised learning; and 3) supervised training of the classifier with all relabelled samples from stage (2). By learning this relationship, we achieve state-of-the-art performance in asymmetric and instance-dependent label noise problems.

Brandon Smart, Gustavo Carneiro• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy66.1
3518
Image ClassificationILSVRC 2012 (test)
Top-1 Acc79.64
117
Image ClassificationANIMAL-10N (test)
Accuracy89.38
75
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy (Symmetric 20%)76.65
72
Image ClassificationWebvision (test)
Acc83.16
57
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy (Symmetric Noise, η=0.2)96.75
25
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Type-I 35% Polynomial Margin Diminishing Noise 1.0 (test)
Accuracy94.72
6
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Type-II 35% Polynomial Margin Diminishing Noise 1.0 (test)
Accuracy94.19
6
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Type-III 35% Polynomial Margin Diminishing Noise 1.0 (test)
Accuracy94.23
6
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 Type-I 35% Polynomial Margin Diminishing Noise 1.0 (test)
Accuracy70.13
6
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update