Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learning

About

Prompting has shown impressive success in enabling large pretrained language models (LMs) to perform diverse NLP tasks, especially when only few downstream data are available. Automatically finding the optimal prompt for each task, however, is challenging. Most existing work resorts to tuning soft prompt (e.g., embeddings) which falls short of interpretability, reusability across LMs, and applicability when gradients are not accessible. Discrete prompt, on the other hand, is difficult to optimize, and is often created by "enumeration (e.g., paraphrasing)-then-selection" heuristics that do not explore the prompt space systematically. This paper proposes RLPrompt, an efficient discrete prompt optimization approach with reinforcement learning (RL). RLPrompt formulates a parameter-efficient policy network that generates the desired discrete prompt after training with reward. To overcome the complexity and stochasticity of reward signals by the large LM environment, we incorporate effective reward stabilization that substantially enhances the training efficiency. RLPrompt is flexibly applicable to different types of LMs, such as masked (e.g., BERT) and left-to-right models (e.g., GPTs), for both classification and generation tasks. Experiments on few-shot classification and unsupervised text style transfer show superior performance over a wide range of existing finetuning or prompting methods. Interestingly, the resulting optimized prompts are often ungrammatical gibberish text; and surprisingly, those gibberish prompts are transferrable between different LMs to retain significant performance, indicating LM prompting may not follow human language patterns.

Mingkai Deng, Jianyu Wang, Cheng-Ping Hsieh, Yihan Wang, Han Guo, Tianmin Shu, Meng Song, Eric P. Xing, Zhiting Hu• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-hop Question AnsweringHotpotQA (test)
F143
255
Topic ClassificationAG-News
Accuracy80.2
225
Text ClassificationSST-2 (test)
Accuracy91.5
185
Sentiment AnalysisSST-2
Accuracy90.1
165
Text ClassificationMR (test)
Accuracy87.1
148
Subjectivity ClassificationSubj (test)
Accuracy82.2
127
Sentiment AnalysisIMDB
Accuracy87.6
67
ReasoningCheckmate-in-One
Accuracy0.00e+0
57
Grade School Math Word Problem SolvingGSM8K (test)
Accuracy53.15
38
Topic ClassificationYahoo (test)
Accuracy48.6
36
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update