Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learning

About

Fine-tuning large pre-trained models on downstream tasks has been adopted in a variety of domains recently. However, it is costly to update the entire parameter set of large pre-trained models. Although recently proposed parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) techniques allow updating a small subset of parameters (e.g. only using 2% of parameters) inside a pre-trained backbone network for a new task, they only reduce the training memory requirement by up to 30%. This is because the gradient computation for the trainable parameters still requires backpropagation through the large pre-trained backbone model. To address this, we propose Ladder Side-Tuning (LST), a new PETL technique that can reduce training memory requirements by more substantial amounts. Unlike existing parameter-efficient methods that insert additional parameters inside backbone networks, we train a ladder side network, a small and separate network that takes intermediate activations as input via shortcut connections (called ladders) from backbone networks and makes predictions. LST has significantly lower memory requirements than previous methods, because it does not require backpropagation through the backbone network, but instead only through the side network and ladder connections. We evaluate our method with various models (T5 and CLIP-T5) on both NLP (GLUE) and vision-and-language (VQA, GQA, NLVR2 , MSCOCO) tasks. LST saves 69% of the memory costs to fine-tune the whole network, while other methods only save 26% of that in similar parameter usages (hence, 2.7x more memory savings). Moreover, LST achieves higher accuracy than Adapter and LoRA in a low-memory regime. To further show the advantage of this better memory efficiency, we also apply LST to larger T5 models, attaining better GLUE performance than full fine-tuning and other PETL methods. The accuracy-efficiency trade-off also holds on VL tasks.

Yi-Lin Sung, Jaemin Cho, Mohit Bansal• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy88.72
3518
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2 (test-dev)
Overall Accuracy75.29
664
Text-to-Image RetrievalFlickr30K
R@166.1
460
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE
SST-295.1
452
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE (test)
SST-2 Accuracy94.7
416
Text-to-Video RetrievalMSR-VTT
Recall@137
313
Image ClassificationImageNet (val)
Accuracy88.2
300
Visual Question AnsweringGQA (test-dev)
Accuracy59.93
178
Visual GroundingRefCOCO+ (val)
Accuracy71.32
171
Visual GroundingRefCOCO+ (testB)
Accuracy62.06
169
Showing 10 of 34 rows

Other info

Follow for update