Dialect-robust Evaluation of Generated Text
About
Evaluation metrics that are not robust to dialect variation make it impossible to tell how well systems perform for many groups of users, and can even penalize systems for producing text in lower-resource dialects. However, currently, there exists no way to quantify how metrics respond to change in the dialect of a generated utterance. We thus formalize dialect robustness and dialect awareness as goals for NLG evaluation metrics. We introduce a suite of methods and corresponding statistical tests one can use to assess metrics in light of the two goals. Applying the suite to current state-of-the-art metrics, we demonstrate that they are not dialect-robust and that semantic perturbations frequently lead to smaller decreases in a metric than the introduction of dialect features. As a first step to overcome this limitation, we propose a training schema, NANO, which introduces regional and language information to the pretraining process of a metric. We demonstrate that NANO provides a size-efficient way for models to improve the dialect robustness while simultaneously improving their performance on the standard metric benchmark.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialect Robustness | EN | Success Rate57 | 11 | |
| Dialect Robustness | PT | Success Rate82 | 11 | |
| Dialect Robustness | ZH | Success Rate74 | 11 | |
| Quality Estimation | Portuguese (pt-BR) dialect sentences (test) | Success Rate86 | 11 | |
| Quality Estimation | Mandarin (zh-CN) dialect sentences (test) | Success Rate84 | 11 | |
| Segment-level agreement with human ratings | WMT 2020 (test) | Agreement (en-cs)73 | 7 | |
| Quality Estimation | WMT 2020 (test) | QE Score (en-cs)71.8 | 6 | |
| Reference-based Quality Estimation | Portuguese (Pt) | R_pb0.85 | 5 | |
| Reference-based Quality Estimation | WMT | Overall Score (en-*)57.6 | 5 | |
| Reference-based Quality Estimation | Chinese (ZH) | R_pb Score0.84 | 5 |