Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Vision

About

The remarkable progress in deep learning in recent years is largely driven by improvements in scale, where bigger models are trained on larger datasets for longer schedules. To predict the benefit of scale empirically, we argue for a more rigorous methodology based on the extrapolation loss, instead of reporting the best-fitting (interpolating) parameters. We then present a recipe for estimating scaling law parameters reliably from learning curves. We demonstrate that it extrapolates more accurately than previous methods in a wide range of architecture families across several domains, including image classification, neural machine translation (NMT) and language modeling, in addition to tasks from the BIG-Bench evaluation benchmark. Finally, we release a benchmark dataset comprising of 90 evaluation tasks to facilitate research in this domain.

Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Behnam Neyshabur, Xiaohua Zhai• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Scaling-law extrapolationMNIST high-C holdout
RMSE (log space)0.295
6
Scaling-law extrapolationPorian grid high-D (holdout)
RMSE (log space)0.079
6
Scaling-law extrapolationCIFAR-100 high-C holdout
RMSE (log space)0.126
6
Scaling-law extrapolationDarcy high-D (holdout)
RMSE (log space)0.361
6
Scaling-law extrapolationMuennighoff grid (high-D holdout)
RMSE (log space)0.101
6
Scaling-law extrapolationMuennighoff grid high-C holdout
RMSE (log space)0.094
6
Scaling-law extrapolationCIFAR-100 high-D holdout
RMSE (log space)0.265
6
Scaling-law extrapolationDarcy high-C (holdout)
RMSE (log space)0.404
6
Scaling-law extrapolationChinchilla grid (high-C holdout)
RMSE (log space)0.067
6
Scaling-law extrapolationPorian grid high-C (holdout)
RMSE (log space)0.114
6
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update