Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

TLP: A Deep Learning-based Cost Model for Tensor Program Tuning

About

Tensor program tuning is a non-convex objective optimization problem, to which search-based approaches have proven to be effective. At the core of the search-based approaches lies the design of the cost model. Though deep learning-based cost models perform significantly better than other methods, they still fall short and suffer from the following problems. First, their feature extraction heavily relies on expert-level domain knowledge in hardware architectures. Even so, the extracted features are often unsatisfactory and require separate considerations for CPUs and GPUs. Second, a cost model trained on one hardware platform usually performs poorly on another, a problem we call cross-hardware unavailability. In order to address these problems, we propose TLP and MTLTLP. TLP is a deep learning-based cost model that facilitates tensor program tuning. Instead of extracting features from the tensor program itself, TLP extracts features from the schedule primitives. We treat schedule primitives as tensor languages. TLP is thus a Tensor Language Processing task. In this way, the task of predicting the tensor program latency through the cost model is transformed into a natural language processing (NLP) regression task. MTL-TLP combines Multi-Task Learning and TLP to cope with the cross-hardware unavailability problem. We incorporate these techniques into the Ansor framework and conduct detailed experiments. Results show that TLP can speed up the average search time by 9.1X and 3.0X on CPU and GPU workloads, respectively, compared to the state-of-the-art implementation. MTL-TLP can achieve a speed-up of 4.7X and 2.9X on CPU and GPU workloads, respectively, using only 7% of the target hardware data.

Yi Zhai, Yu Zhang, Shuo Liu, Xiaomeng Chu, Jie Peng, Jianmin Ji, Yanyong Zhang• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Cost modelingIntel Platinum 8272CL
Top-1 Accuracy91.94
3
Cost modelingIntel E5-2673 v4
Top-1 Score89.41
3
Cost modelingAMD EPYC 7452
Top-1 Accuracy90.55
3
Cost modelingARM Graviton2
Top-1 Score82.07
3
Cost modelingIntel i7-12700F
Top-1 Score90.68
3
Cost modelingNVIDIA Tesla K80
Top-1 Score90.59
3
Cost modelingNVIDIA Tesla T4
Top-1 Score88.47
3
Cost modelingNVIDIA RTX 3080Ti
Top-1 Score83.46
3
Tensor Program OptimizationIntel i7-12700F 10% sample (target)
Top-1 Score87.44
3
Tensor Program OptimizationNVIDIA 3080Ti 10% sample (target)
Top-1 Score82.28
3
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update