Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond Smoothing: Unsupervised Graph Representation Learning with Edge Heterophily Discriminating

About

Unsupervised graph representation learning (UGRL) has drawn increasing research attention and achieved promising results in several graph analytic tasks. Relying on the homophily assumption, existing UGRL methods tend to smooth the learned node representations along all edges, ignoring the existence of heterophilic edges that connect nodes with distinct attributes. As a result, current methods are hard to generalize to heterophilic graphs where dissimilar nodes are widely connected, and also vulnerable to adversarial attacks. To address this issue, we propose a novel unsupervised Graph Representation learning method with Edge hEterophily discriminaTing (GREET) which learns representations by discriminating and leveraging homophilic edges and heterophilic edges. To distinguish two types of edges, we build an edge discriminator that infers edge homophily/heterophily from feature and structure information. We train the edge discriminator in an unsupervised way through minimizing the crafted pivot-anchored ranking loss, with randomly sampled node pairs acting as pivots. Node representations are learned through contrasting the dual-channel encodings obtained from the discriminated homophilic and heterophilic edges. With an effective interplaying scheme, edge discriminating and representation learning can mutually boost each other during the training phase. We conducted extensive experiments on 14 benchmark datasets and multiple learning scenarios to demonstrate the superiority of GREET.

Yixin Liu, Yizhen Zheng, Daokun Zhang, Vincent CS Lee, Shirui Pan• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy83.81
1215
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy73.08
931
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy85.16
861
Node ClassificationCiteseer (test)
Accuracy0.7906
824
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy80.29
819
Node ClassificationChameleon
Accuracy63.6
640
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy84.9
627
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.87
616
Node ClassificationSquirrel
Accuracy42.3
591
Node ClassificationCornell
Accuracy85.1
582
Showing 10 of 30 rows

Other info

Follow for update