ABINet++: Autonomous, Bidirectional and Iterative Language Modeling for Scene Text Spotting
About
Scene text spotting is of great importance to the computer vision community due to its wide variety of applications. Recent methods attempt to introduce linguistic knowledge for challenging recognition rather than pure visual classification. However, how to effectively model the linguistic rules in end-to-end deep networks remains a research challenge. In this paper, we argue that the limited capacity of language models comes from 1) implicit language modeling; 2) unidirectional feature representation; and 3) language model with noise input. Correspondingly, we propose an autonomous, bidirectional and iterative ABINet++ for scene text spotting. Firstly, the autonomous suggests enforcing explicitly language modeling by decoupling the recognizer into vision model and language model and blocking gradient flow between both models. Secondly, a novel bidirectional cloze network (BCN) as the language model is proposed based on bidirectional feature representation. Thirdly, we propose an execution manner of iterative correction for the language model which can effectively alleviate the impact of noise input. Finally, to polish ABINet++ in long text recognition, we propose to aggregate horizontal features by embedding Transformer units inside a U-Net, and design a position and content attention module which integrates character order and content to attend to character features precisely. ABINet++ achieves state-of-the-art performance on both scene text recognition and scene text spotting benchmarks, which consistently demonstrates the superiority of our method in various environments especially on low-quality images. Besides, extensive experiments including in English and Chinese also prove that, a text spotter that incorporates our language modeling method can significantly improve its performance both in accuracy and speed compared with commonly used attention-based recognizers.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scene Text Recognition | IC13, IC15, IIIT, SVT, SVTP, CUTE80 Average of 6 benchmarks (test) | Average Accuracy91.93 | 105 | |
| Scene Text Recognition | SVT 647 (test) | Accuracy97.1 | 101 | |
| Scene Text Recognition | CUTE 288 samples (test) | Word Accuracy94.4 | 98 | |
| End-to-End Text Spotting | ICDAR 2015 | Strong Score86.1 | 80 | |
| End-to-End Scene Text Spotting | Total-Text | Hmean (None)79.4 | 55 | |
| Scene Text Recognition | SVTP 645 (test) | Accuracy92.2 | 54 | |
| Scene Text Recognition | IIIT 3000 (test) | Accuracy97.2 | 35 | |
| Text Recognition | Chinese text recognition benchmark | Scene Acc66.6 | 33 | |
| Scene Text Recognition | IC15 1811 (test) | Accuracy89.2 | 30 | |
| Scene Text Recognition | IC13 857 (test) | Accuracy98.1 | 27 |