Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Model

About

The shuffle model of differential privacy (Erlingsson et al. SODA 2019; Cheu et al. EUROCRYPT 2019) and its close relative encode-shuffle-analyze (Bittau et al. SOSP 2017) provide a fertile middle ground between the well-known local and central models. Similarly to the local model, the shuffle model assumes an untrusted data collector who receives privatized messages from users, but in this case a secure shuffler is used to transmit messages from users to the collector in a way that hides which messages came from which user. An interesting feature of the shuffle model is that increasing the amount of messages sent by each user can lead to protocols with accuracies comparable to the ones achievable in the central model. In particular, for the problem of privately computing the sum of $n$ bounded real values held by $n$ different users, Cheu et al. showed that $O(\sqrt{n})$ messages per user suffice to achieve $O(1)$ error (the optimal rate in the central model), while Balle et al. (CRYPTO 2019) recently showed that a single message per user leads to $\Theta(n^{1/3})$ MSE (mean squared error), a rate strictly in-between what is achievable in the local and central models. This paper introduces two new protocols for summation in the shuffle model with improved accuracy and communication trade-offs. Our first contribution is a recursive construction based on the protocol from Balle et al. mentioned above, providing $\mathrm{poly}(\log \log n)$ error with $O(\log \log n)$ messages per user. The second contribution is a protocol with $O(1)$ error and $O(1)$ messages per user based on a novel analysis of the reduction from secure summation to shuffling introduced by Ishai et al. (FOCS 2006) (the original reduction required $O(\log n)$ messages per user).

Borja Balle, James Bell, Adria Gascon, Kobbi Nissim• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Bit CountingSF_Sal
Relative Error1.07
10
Bit CountingBR_Sal
Relative Error2.05
10
Bit CountingAdult
Relative Error7.61
10
SummationSF Sal
Relative Error2.08
6
SummationBR_Sal
Relative Error6.55
6
SummationAdult
Relative Error9.36
6
Bit Counting (Qcount)Synthetic Unif distribution
Relative Error (w/o attacker)1.04
5
Bit Counting (Qcount)Synthetic Gauss distribution
Relative Error (w/o attacker)6.69
5
Bit Counting (Qcount)Synthetic Zipf distribution
Relative Error (w/o attacker)6.91
5
Summation (Qsum)Synthetic Zipf distribution
Relative Error (w/o Attacker)1.56
3
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update