How Powerful are K-hop Message Passing Graph Neural Networks
About
The most popular design paradigm for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is 1-hop message passing -- aggregating information from 1-hop neighbors repeatedly. However, the expressive power of 1-hop message passing is bounded by the Weisfeiler-Lehman (1-WL) test. Recently, researchers extended 1-hop message passing to K-hop message passing by aggregating information from K-hop neighbors of nodes simultaneously. However, there is no work on analyzing the expressive power of K-hop message passing. In this work, we theoretically characterize the expressive power of K-hop message passing. Specifically, we first formally differentiate two different kernels of K-hop message passing which are often misused in previous works. We then characterize the expressive power of K-hop message passing by showing that it is more powerful than 1-WL and can distinguish almost all regular graphs. Despite the higher expressive power, we show that K-hop message passing still cannot distinguish some simple regular graphs and its expressive power is bounded by 3-WL. To further enhance its expressive power, we introduce a KP-GNN framework, which improves K-hop message passing by leveraging the peripheral subgraph information in each hop. We show that KP-GNN can distinguish many distance regular graphs which could not be distinguished by previous distance encoding or 3-WL methods. Experimental results verify the expressive power and effectiveness of KP-GNN. KP-GNN achieves competitive results across all benchmark datasets.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graph Classification | PROTEINS | Accuracy79.5 | 994 | |
| Graph Classification | MUTAG | Accuracy95.6 | 862 | |
| Graph Classification | PTC-MR | Accuracy76.2 | 197 | |
| Graph Regression | ZINC 12K (test) | MAE0.093 | 164 | |
| Graph Classification | DHFR | Accuracy86.8 | 140 | |
| Graph Classification | IMDB MULTI | Accuracy55.5 | 124 | |
| Graph Classification | D&D | Accuracy84 | 123 | |
| Graph Classification | imdb-binary | Accuracy79.7 | 100 | |
| Graph Classification | BZR | Accuracy93.5 | 89 | |
| Graph Classification | COX2 | Accuracy88.8 | 80 |