Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Improving Federated Learning Personalization via Model Agnostic Meta Learning

About

Federated Learning (FL) refers to learning a high quality global model based on decentralized data storage, without ever copying the raw data. A natural scenario arises with data created on mobile phones by the activity of their users. Given the typical data heterogeneity in such situations, it is natural to ask how can the global model be personalized for every such device, individually. In this work, we point out that the setting of Model Agnostic Meta Learning (MAML), where one optimizes for a fast, gradient-based, few-shot adaptation to a heterogeneous distribution of tasks, has a number of similarities with the objective of personalization for FL. We present FL as a natural source of practical applications for MAML algorithms, and make the following observations. 1) The popular FL algorithm, Federated Averaging, can be interpreted as a meta learning algorithm. 2) Careful fine-tuning can yield a global model with higher accuracy, which is at the same time easier to personalize. However, solely optimizing for the global model accuracy yields a weaker personalization result. 3) A model trained using a standard datacenter optimization method is much harder to personalize, compared to one trained using Federated Averaging, supporting the first claim. These results raise new questions for FL, MAML, and broader ML research.

Yihan Jiang, Jakub Kone\v{c}n\'y, Keith Rush, Sreeram Kannan• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)--
3518
Image ClassificationEMNIST (test)
Accuracy83.1
174
Image ClassificationFEMNIST (test)
Accuracy75.3
83
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 (test)
Accuracy82.3
76
Next-Character PredictionShakespeare (test)
Accuracy40
31
ClassificationSynthetic (test)
Accuracy69
22
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 33 (test)
Avg Accuracy82.3
7
Handwritten character recognitionEMNIST 8 (test)
Average Accuracy83.1
7
Binary ClassificationSynthetic (test)
Avg Accuracy68.9
7
Handwritten character recognitionFEMNIST 7 (test)
Avg Accuracy75.3
7
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update