Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Decompositional Generation Process for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learning

About

Partial label learning (PLL) is a typical weakly supervised learning problem, where each training example is associated with a set of candidate labels among which only one is true. Most existing PLL approaches assume that the incorrect labels in each training example are randomly picked as the candidate labels and model the generation process of the candidate labels in a simple way. However, these approaches usually do not perform as well as expected due to the fact that the generation process of the candidate labels is always instance-dependent. Therefore, it deserves to be modeled in a refined way. In this paper, we consider instance-dependent PLL and assume that the generation process of the candidate labels could decompose into two sequential parts, where the correct label emerges first in the mind of the annotator but then the incorrect labels related to the feature are also selected with the correct label as candidate labels due to uncertainty of labeling. Motivated by this consideration, we propose a novel PLL method that performs Maximum A Posterior (MAP) based on an explicitly modeled generation process of candidate labels via decomposed probability distribution models. Extensive experiments on manually corrupted benchmark datasets and real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Source code is available at https://github.com/palm-ml/idgp.

Congyu Qiao, Ning Xu, Xin Geng• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationFashion MNIST (test)
Accuracy91.2
568
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy87.57
507
Image ClassificationMNIST
Accuracy98.92
395
Image ClassificationFashion MNIST
Accuracy91.48
225
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 standard (test)
Top-1 Accuracy64.67
133
Image ClassificationKuzushiji-MNIST
Accuracy96.88
16
Image ClassificationMNIST standard (test)
Clean Accuracy98.87
9
Image ClassificationKuzushiji-MNIST standard (test)
Accuracy97.28
9
ClassificationLost (test)
Accuracy77.02
7
ClassificationBirdSong (test)
Accuracy74.23
7
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update