Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization

About

Recently, there has been a growing surge of interest in enabling machine learning systems to generalize well to Out-of-Distribution (OOD) data. Most efforts are devoted to advancing optimization objectives that regularize models to capture the underlying invariance; however, there often are compromises in the optimization process of these OOD objectives: i) Many OOD objectives have to be relaxed as penalty terms of Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) for the ease of optimization, while the relaxed forms can weaken the robustness of the original objective; ii) The penalty terms also require careful tuning of the penalty weights due to the intrinsic conflicts between ERM and OOD objectives. Consequently, these compromises could easily lead to suboptimal performance of either the ERM or OOD objective. To address these issues, we introduce a multi-objective optimization (MOO) perspective to understand the OOD optimization process, and propose a new optimization scheme called PAreto Invariant Risk Minimization (PAIR). PAIR improves the robustness of OOD objectives by cooperatively optimizing with other OOD objectives, thereby bridging the gaps caused by the relaxations. Then PAIR approaches a Pareto optimal solution that trades off the ERM and OOD objectives properly. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmarks, WILDS, show that PAIR alleviates the compromises and yields top OOD performances.

Yongqiang Chen, Kaiwen Zhou, Yatao Bian, Binghui Xie, Bingzhe Wu, Yonggang Zhang, Kaili Ma, Han Yang, Peilin Zhao, Bo Han, James Cheng• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
ClassificationCamelyon17
Accuracy73.49
58
Image RecognitioniWILDCam
Accuracy28.82
39
Image ClassificationRxRx1 ID WILDS (val)
Top-1 Accuracy18.9
16
Image ClassificationRxRx1 OOD WILDS (test)
Top-1 Acc28.8
16
Image ClassificationCamelyon17-WILDS out-of-distribution (val)
Accuracy84.3
16
Image ClassificationRxRx1 Wilds (test id)
Accuracy34.7
12
Out-of-distribution classificationCamelyon17 WILDS OOD (test)
Accuracy74
7
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update