Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Set Features for Fine-grained Anomaly Detection

About

Fine-grained anomaly detection has recently been dominated by segmentation based approaches. These approaches first classify each element of the sample (e.g., image patch) as normal or anomalous and then classify the entire sample as anomalous if it contains anomalous elements. However, such approaches do not extend to scenarios where the anomalies are expressed by an unusual combination of normal elements. In this paper, we overcome this limitation by proposing set features that model each sample by the distribution its elements. We compute the anomaly score of each sample using a simple density estimation method. Our simple-to-implement approach outperforms the state-of-the-art in image-level logical anomaly detection (+3.4%) and sequence-level time-series anomaly detection (+2.4%).

Niv Cohen, Issar Tzachor, Yedid Hoshen• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Anomaly LocalizationMVTec-AD (test)
Pixel AUROC97.8
181
Anomaly DetectionMVTec-LOCO 1.0 (test)
ROC-AUC (Total)86.8
53
Anomaly DetectionMVTec LOCO
Average Score88.9
50
Anomaly DetectionMVTec LOCO AD Structural Anomalies
Average (Structural Anomalies)84.7
26
Anomaly DetectionEPSY UEA (test)
ROC-AUC98.1
20
Anomaly DetectionNAT UEA (test)
ROC-AUC0.961
20
Anomaly DetectionCT UEA (test)
ROC AUC (%)99.7
20
Anomaly DetectionRS UEA (test)
ROC AUC92.3
20
Anomaly DetectionSAD UEA (test)
ROC-AUC97.8
20
Anomaly DetectionMVTec-AD (test)
Average AUROC98.5
15
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update