Rethinking the Effect of Data Augmentation in Adversarial Contrastive Learning
About
Recent works have shown that self-supervised learning can achieve remarkable robustness when integrated with adversarial training (AT). However, the robustness gap between supervised AT (sup-AT) and self-supervised AT (self-AT) remains significant. Motivated by this observation, we revisit existing self-AT methods and discover an inherent dilemma that affects self-AT robustness: either strong or weak data augmentations are harmful to self-AT, and a medium strength is insufficient to bridge the gap. To resolve this dilemma, we propose a simple remedy named DYNACL (Dynamic Adversarial Contrastive Learning). In particular, we propose an augmentation schedule that gradually anneals from a strong augmentation to a weak one to benefit from both extreme cases. Besides, we adopt a fast post-processing stage for adapting it to downstream tasks. Through extensive experiments, we show that DYNACL can improve state-of-the-art self-AT robustness by 8.84% under Auto-Attack on the CIFAR-10 dataset, and can even outperform vanilla supervised adversarial training for the first time. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/PKU-ML/DYNACL}.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | STL-10 (test) | -- | 357 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-C (test) | -- | 61 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100-C v1 (test) | -- | 60 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 pre-trained on CIFAR-10 (test) | AA47.4 | 24 | |
| Image Classification | STL-10 pre-trained on CIFAR-10 (test) | -- | 22 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 (test) | AA50.52 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | STL-10 pre-trained on CIFAR-100 (test) | Average Accuracy31.17 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-C CS-1 1.0 (test) | Mean Accuracy79.77 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-C CS-5 1.0 (test) | Mean Accuracy65.6 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 (test) | Average Accuracy (AA)24.7 | 12 |