Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

TimeMAE: Self-Supervised Representations of Time Series with Decoupled Masked Autoencoders

About

Learning transferable representations from unlabeled time series is crucial for improving performance in data-scarce classification. Existing self-supervised methods often operate at the point level and rely on unidirectional encoding, leading to low semantic density and a mismatch between pre-training and downstream optimization. In this paper, we propose TimeMAE, a self-supervised framework that reformulates masked modeling for time series via semantic unit elevation and decoupled representation learning. Instead of modeling individual time steps, TimeMAE segments time series into non-overlapping sub-series to form semantically enriched units, enabling more informative masked reconstruction while reducing computational cost. To address the representation discrepancy introduced by masking, we design a decoupled masked autoencoder that separately encodes visible and masked regions, avoiding artificial masked tokens in the main encoder. To guide pre-training, we introduce two complementary objectives: masked codeword classification, which discretizes sub-series semantics via a learned tokenizer and masked representation regression, which aligns continuous representations through a momentum-updated target encoder. Extensive experiments on five datasets demonstrate that TimeMAE outperforms competitive baselines, particularly in label-scarce scenarios and transfer learning scenarios.

Mingyue Cheng, Xiaoyu Tao, Zhiding Liu, Qi Liu, Hao Zhang, Rujiao Zhang, Enhong Chen• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multivariate ForecastingETTh1
MSE0.395
645
ClassificationSynthetic Dynamical Systems Lorenz, Thomas, and Hindmarsh-Rose (test)
Accuracy96.29
40
Multivariate time series predictionElectricity
MSE0.133
24
ClassificationPPG (1% labels)
Accuracy44.4
19
ClassificationHAR (1% labels)
Accuracy81.02
19
ClassificationEEG (5% labels)
Accuracy77.5
19
ClassificationHAR 5% labels
Accuracy91.55
19
ClassificationEEG (1% labels)
Accuracy69.1
19
ClassificationPPG (5% labels)
Accuracy49.53
19
ClassificationECG (5% labels)
Accuracy68.73
19
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update