Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by Exploiting All Unlabeled Data

About

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has attracted enormous attention due to its vast potential of mitigating the dependence on large labeled datasets. The latest methods (e.g., FixMatch) use a combination of consistency regularization and pseudo-labeling to achieve remarkable successes. However, these methods all suffer from the waste of complicated examples since all pseudo-labels have to be selected by a high threshold to filter out noisy ones. Hence, the examples with ambiguous predictions will not contribute to the training phase. For better leveraging all unlabeled examples, we propose two novel techniques: Entropy Meaning Loss (EML) and Adaptive Negative Learning (ANL). EML incorporates the prediction distribution of non-target classes into the optimization objective to avoid competition with target class, and thus generating more high-confidence predictions for selecting pseudo-label. ANL introduces the additional negative pseudo-label for all unlabeled data to leverage low-confidence examples. It adaptively allocates this label by dynamically evaluating the top-k performance of the model. EML and ANL do not introduce any additional parameter and hyperparameter. We integrate these techniques with FixMatch, and develop a simple yet powerful framework called FullMatch. Extensive experiments on several common SSL benchmarks (CIFAR-10/100, SVHN, STL-10 and ImageNet) demonstrate that FullMatch exceeds FixMatch by a large margin. Integrated with FlexMatch (an advanced FixMatch-based framework), we achieve state-of-the-art performance. Source code is at https://github.com/megvii-research/FullMatch.

Yuhao Chen, Xin Tan, Borui Zhao, Zhaowei Chen, Renjie Song, Jiajun Liang, Xuequan Lu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)--
3518
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)--
3381
Image ClassificationSTL-10 (test)--
357
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 40 labels
Error Rate4.44
81
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 25 labels per class 32x32
Error Rate4.39
15
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Follow for update