Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learning

About

Intermediate features of a pre-trained model have been shown informative for making accurate predictions on downstream tasks, even if the model backbone is kept frozen. The key challenge is how to utilize these intermediate features given their gigantic amount. We propose visual query tuning (VQT), a simple yet effective approach to aggregate intermediate features of Vision Transformers. Through introducing a handful of learnable ``query'' tokens to each layer, VQT leverages the inner workings of Transformers to ``summarize'' rich intermediate features of each layer, which can then be used to train the prediction heads of downstream tasks. As VQT keeps the intermediate features intact and only learns to combine them, it enjoys memory efficiency in training, compared to many other parameter-efficient fine-tuning approaches that learn to adapt features and need back-propagation through the entire backbone. This also suggests the complementary role between VQT and those approaches in transfer learning. Empirically, VQT consistently surpasses the state-of-the-art approach that utilizes intermediate features for transfer learning and outperforms full fine-tuning in many cases. Compared to parameter-efficient approaches that adapt features, VQT achieves much higher accuracy under memory constraints. Most importantly, VQT is compatible with these approaches to attain even higher accuracy, making it a simple add-on to further boost transfer learning.

Cheng-Hao Tu, Zheda Mai, Wei-Lun Chao• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationVTAB 1K
Overall Mean Accuracy73.05
204
Image ClassificationVTAB 1k (test)
Accuracy (Natural)66
121
Medical Image ClassificationBTC
Accuracy78.93
107
Image ClassificationVTAB-1K 1.0 (test)
Natural Accuracy82.1
102
Medical Image ClassificationBUSI
Accuracy87.66
88
Visual Task AdaptationVTAB 1K
Average Accuracy57.6
78
Medical Image ClassificationCOVID
Accuracy79.8
54
Medical Image ClassificationISIC
Accuracy77.12
39
Image ClassificationFGVC
Accuracy89.41
38
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update