PillarNeXt: Rethinking Network Designs for 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Point Clouds
About
In order to deal with the sparse and unstructured raw point clouds, LiDAR based 3D object detection research mostly focuses on designing dedicated local point aggregators for fine-grained geometrical modeling. In this paper, we revisit the local point aggregators from the perspective of allocating computational resources. We find that the simplest pillar based models perform surprisingly well considering both accuracy and latency. Additionally, we show that minimal adaptions from the success of 2D object detection, such as enlarging receptive field, significantly boost the performance. Extensive experiments reveal that our pillar based networks with modernized designs in terms of architecture and training render the state-of-the-art performance on the two popular benchmarks: Waymo Open Dataset and nuScenes. Our results challenge the common intuition that the detailed geometry modeling is essential to achieve high performance for 3D object detection.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Object Detection | nuScenes (val) | NDS68.8 | 941 | |
| 3D Object Detection | Waymo Open Dataset (val) | 3D APH Vehicle L269.8 | 175 | |
| 3D Object Detection | Waymo Open Dataset (test) | Vehicle L2 mAPH75.76 | 105 | |
| 3D Object Detection | nuScenes v1.0-trainval (val) | NDS68.4 | 87 | |
| 3D Object Detection | View-of-Delft (VoD) Entire Annotated Area (val) | mAP3D42.23 | 86 | |
| 3D Object Detection | View-of-Delft (VoD) In Driving Corridor (val) | AP3D (Car)66.72 | 52 | |
| 3D Object Detection | Waymo Open Dataset (WOD) (val) | Vehicle L1 mAP80.58 | 47 | |
| 3D Object Detection | Waymo Open Dataset LEVEL_2 (val) | 3D AP (Overall)71.9 | 46 | |
| 3D Object Detection | Waymo Open Dataset LEVEL_1 (val) | -- | 46 | |
| 3D Object Detection | TJ4DRadSet (test) | mAP3D29.2 | 44 |