Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control
About
Large language models (LLMs) trained on code completion have been shown to be capable of synthesizing simple Python programs from docstrings [1]. We find that these code-writing LLMs can be re-purposed to write robot policy code, given natural language commands. Specifically, policy code can express functions or feedback loops that process perception outputs (e.g.,from object detectors [2], [3]) and parameterize control primitive APIs. When provided as input several example language commands (formatted as comments) followed by corresponding policy code (via few-shot prompting), LLMs can take in new commands and autonomously re-compose API calls to generate new policy code respectively. By chaining classic logic structures and referencing third-party libraries (e.g., NumPy, Shapely) to perform arithmetic, LLMs used in this way can write robot policies that (i) exhibit spatial-geometric reasoning, (ii) generalize to new instructions, and (iii) prescribe precise values (e.g., velocities) to ambiguous descriptions ("faster") depending on context (i.e., behavioral commonsense). This paper presents code as policies: a robot-centric formulation of language model generated programs (LMPs) that can represent reactive policies (e.g., impedance controllers), as well as waypoint-based policies (vision-based pick and place, trajectory-based control), demonstrated across multiple real robot platforms. Central to our approach is prompting hierarchical code-gen (recursively defining undefined functions), which can write more complex code and also improves state-of-the-art to solve 39.8% of problems on the HumanEval [1] benchmark. Code and videos are available at https://code-as-policies.github.io
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic manipulation task code generation | Tabletop Manipulation simulator | Execution Success Rate100 | 30 | |
| Robot Manipulation | Real-world Robot Environment 1.0 (test) | Success Rate7.00e+3 | 24 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | VIMA-Bench | Task 1 Score76.3 | 13 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | RLBench standard (test) | Reach Target Success Rate95 | 12 | |
| Robot Manipulation Planning | OWL-TAMP Mug2 | Success Rate0.00e+0 | 8 | |
| Robot Manipulation Planning | OWL-TAMP SoupPour | Success Rate0.00e+0 | 8 | |
| Robot Manipulation Planning | OWL-TAMP BerryCook | Success Rate0.00e+0 | 8 | |
| Robot Manipulation Planning | OWL-TAMP FruitSort | Success Rate0.00e+0 | 8 | |
| Robot Manipulation Planning | OWL-TAMP Coffee | Success Rate0.00e+0 | 8 | |
| Robot Manipulation Planning | OWL-TAMP Mug1 | Success Rate0.00e+0 | 8 |