Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samples

About

Learning the continuous dynamics of a system from snapshots of its temporal marginals is a problem which appears throughout natural sciences and machine learning, including in quantum systems, single-cell biological data, and generative modeling. In these settings, we assume access to cross-sectional samples that are uncorrelated over time, rather than full trajectories of samples. In order to better understand the systems under observation, we would like to learn a model of the underlying process that allows us to propagate samples in time and thereby simulate entire individual trajectories. In this work, we propose Action Matching, a method for learning a rich family of dynamics using only independent samples from its time evolution. We derive a tractable training objective, which does not rely on explicit assumptions about the underlying dynamics and does not require back-propagation through differential equations or optimal transport solvers. Inspired by connections with optimal transport, we derive extensions of Action Matching to learn stochastic differential equations and dynamics involving creation and destruction of probability mass. Finally, we showcase applications of Action Matching by achieving competitive performance in a diverse set of experiments from biology, physics, and generative modeling.

Kirill Neklyudov, Rob Brekelmans, Daniel Severo, Alireza Makhzani• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Population Dynamics InterpolationEB scRNA 5-dim PCA representation (leave-one-out)
W1 Distance0.924
21
Population Dynamics InterpolationGulf of Mexico small vortex (Interpolation)
Error (t=2)0.291
11
Trajectory InferencePetal dataset
KL Divergence (A || B)12.328
7
Trajectory InferenceRepressilator (tau=0.1) synthetic (val)
EMD1.454
7
Trajectory InferencePetal dataset tau=0
EMD0.016
7
Trajectory InferenceLotka–Volterra Path Measure
KL Divergence (nu^A || nu^B)44.914
7
Trajectory InferenceRepressilator synthetic (val)
KL Divergence (nu_A || nu_B)66.901
7
Trajectory InferencePetal dataset tau=0.25
EMD0.102
7
Trajectory InferenceLotka–Volterra tau=0.125
EMD0.862
7
Trajectory InferenceLotka–Volterra (tau=0.375)
EMD34.2
7
Showing 10 of 33 rows

Other info

Follow for update