Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Normalizing Flows for Interventional Density Estimation

About

Existing machine learning methods for causal inference usually estimate quantities expressed via the mean of potential outcomes (e.g., average treatment effect). However, such quantities do not capture the full information about the distribution of potential outcomes. In this work, we estimate the density of potential outcomes after interventions from observational data. For this, we propose a novel, fully-parametric deep learning method called Interventional Normalizing Flows. Specifically, we combine two normalizing flows, namely (i) a nuisance flow for estimating nuisance parameters and (ii) a target flow for parametric estimation of the density of potential outcomes. We further develop a tractable optimization objective based on a one-step bias correction for efficient and doubly robust estimation of the target flow parameters. As a result, our Interventional Normalizing Flows offer a properly normalized density estimator. Across various experiments, we demonstrate that our Interventional Normalizing Flows are expressive and highly effective, and scale well with both sample size and high-dimensional confounding. To the best of our knowledge, our Interventional Normalizing Flows are the first proper fully-parametric, deep learning method for density estimation of potential outcomes.

Valentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen, Stefan Feuerriegel• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Individual Treatment Effect EstimationIHDP (out-of-sample)--
45
CATE estimationACIC 2016 (Out-sample)
PEHE1.42
22
CATE estimationIHDP (Out-sample)
PEHE0.95
22
CATE estimationIHDP (In-sample)
PEHE0.9
22
Potential Outcome EstimationIHDP (In-sample)
RMSE1.02
19
Potential Outcome EstimationACIC in-sample 2018
RMSE0.69
19
Potential Outcome EstimationACIC out-of-sample 2018
RMSE0.78
19
Potential Outcome EstimationIBM in-sample
RMSE1.52
19
Potential Outcome EstimationIBM out-of-sample
RMSE1.57
19
CATE estimationACIC 2016 (In-sample)--
13
Showing 10 of 27 rows

Other info

Follow for update