1M parameters are enough? A lightweight CNN-based model for medical image segmentation
About
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based models are being widely applied in medical image segmentation thanks to their ability to extract high-level features and capture important aspects of the image. However, there is often a trade-off between the need for high accuracy and the desire for low computational cost. A model with higher parameters can theoretically achieve better performance but also result in more computational complexity and higher memory usage, and thus is not practical to implement. In this paper, we look for a lightweight U-Net-based model which can remain the same or even achieve better performance, namely U-Lite. We design U-Lite based on the principle of Depthwise Separable Convolution so that the model can both leverage the strength of CNNs and reduce a remarkable number of computing parameters. Specifically, we propose Axial Depthwise Convolutions with kernels 7x7 in both the encoder and decoder to enlarge the model receptive field. To further improve the performance, we use several Axial Dilated Depthwise Convolutions with filters 3x3 for the bottleneck as one of our branches. Overall, U-Lite contains only 878K parameters, 35 times less than the traditional U-Net, and much more times less than other modern Transformer-based models. The proposed model cuts down a large amount of computational complexity while attaining an impressive performance on medical segmentation tasks compared to other state-of-the-art architectures. The code will be available at: https://github.com/duong-db/U-Lite.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin Lesion Segmentation | ISIC 2017 (test) | Dice Score87.61 | 134 | |
| Skin Lesion Segmentation | ISIC 2018 | Dice Coefficient88.11 | 94 | |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | STARE | -- | 90 | |
| Skin Lesion Segmentation | PH2 | DIC0.9059 | 87 | |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | DRIVE | -- | 73 | |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | CHASE DB1 | -- | 53 | |
| Polyp Segmentation | CVC-ClinicDB, CVC-ColonDB, and Kvasir-SEG (Macro-averaged) | Dice Score59.7 | 30 | |
| Polyp Segmentation | PolypGen | Dice Coefficient38.7 | 24 | |
| Polyp Segmentation | CVC-ClinicDB Noisy (test) | Dice Coefficient58.4 | 18 | |
| Polyp Segmentation | CVC-ClinicDB Clean (test) | Dice Score64.7 | 18 |