Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Re-Think and Re-Design Graph Neural Networks in Spaces of Continuous Graph Diffusion Functionals

About

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used in domains like social networks and biological systems. However, the locality assumption of GNNs, which limits information exchange to neighboring nodes, hampers their ability to capture long-range dependencies and global patterns in graphs. To address this, we propose a new inductive bias based on variational analysis, drawing inspiration from the Brachistochrone problem. Our framework establishes a mapping between discrete GNN models and continuous diffusion functionals. This enables the design of application-specific objective functions in the continuous domain and the construction of discrete deep models with mathematical guarantees. To tackle over-smoothing in GNNs, we analyze the existing layer-by-layer graph embedding models and identify that they are equivalent to l2-norm integral functionals of graph gradients, which cause over-smoothing. Similar to edge-preserving filters in image denoising, we introduce total variation (TV) to align the graph diffusion pattern with global community topologies. Additionally, we devise a selective mechanism to address the trade-off between model depth and over-smoothing, which can be easily integrated into existing GNNs. Furthermore, we propose a novel generative adversarial network (GAN) that predicts spreading flows in graphs through a neural transport equation. To mitigate vanishing flows, we customize the objective function to minimize transportation within each community while maximizing inter-community flows. Our GNN models achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on popular graph learning benchmarks such as Cora, Citeseer, and Pubmed.

Tingting Dan, Jiaqi Ding, Ziquan Wei, Shahar Z Kovalsky, Minjeong Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Guorong Wu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy86.3
861
Node ClassificationCiteseer (test)
Accuracy0.7565
824
Node ClassificationPubMed (test)
Accuracy80.21
546
Disease risk predictionTau modality (AD/LMCI vs. CN/EMCI)
Precision91.58
12
Disease risk predictionTau modality AD vs. CN
Precision95.91
12
Disease risk predictionAmyloid modality AD/LMCI vs. CN/EMCI
Precision83.78
12
Disease risk predictionAmyloid modality AD vs. CN
Precision93.09
12
Disease risk predictionFDG AD/LMCI vs. CN/EMCI
Precision70.94
12
Disease risk predictionFDG modality AD vs. CN
Precision87.25
12
Disease risk predictionCoTh modality (AD vs. CN)
Precision85.77
12
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update