Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Local or Global: Selective Knowledge Assimilation for Federated Learning with Limited Labels

About

Many existing FL methods assume clients with fully-labeled data, while in realistic settings, clients have limited labels due to the expensive and laborious process of labeling. Limited labeled local data of the clients often leads to their local model having poor generalization abilities to their larger unlabeled local data, such as having class-distribution mismatch with the unlabeled data. As a result, clients may instead look to benefit from the global model trained across clients to leverage their unlabeled data, but this also becomes difficult due to data heterogeneity across clients. In our work, we propose FedLabel where clients selectively choose the local or global model to pseudo-label their unlabeled data depending on which is more of an expert of the data. We further utilize both the local and global models' knowledge via global-local consistency regularization which minimizes the divergence between the two models' outputs when they have identical pseudo-labels for the unlabeled data. Unlike other semi-supervised FL baselines, our method does not require additional experts other than the local or global model, nor require additional parameters to be communicated. We also do not assume any server-labeled data or fully labeled clients. For both cross-device and cross-silo settings, we show that FedLabel outperforms other semi-supervised FL baselines by $8$-$24\%$, and even outperforms standard fully supervised FL baselines ($100\%$ labeled data) with only $5$-$20\%$ of labeled data.

Yae Jee Cho, Gauri Joshi, Dimitrios Dimitriadis• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCINIC-10 (test)
Accuracy72.22
177
Image ClassificationSVHN (test)
Accuracy94.59
51
ClassificationCIFAR-100 10% labeled data
Accuracy52.38
46
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy0.5923
42
Image ClassificationCINIC-10 1.0 (10% label)
Accuracy72.8
42
Image ClassificationSVHN 1.0 (10% label)
Accuracy91.51
42
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 10% label
Accuracy79.46
42
Federated Semi-supervised LearningCIFAR100 alpha=1.0 (test)
Convergence Round91
21
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 alpha=0.1 (test)
Steps to 30% Accuracy94
7
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update