RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control
About
We study how vision-language models trained on Internet-scale data can be incorporated directly into end-to-end robotic control to boost generalization and enable emergent semantic reasoning. Our goal is to enable a single end-to-end trained model to both learn to map robot observations to actions and enjoy the benefits of large-scale pretraining on language and vision-language data from the web. To this end, we propose to co-fine-tune state-of-the-art vision-language models on both robotic trajectory data and Internet-scale vision-language tasks, such as visual question answering. In contrast to other approaches, we propose a simple, general recipe to achieve this goal: in order to fit both natural language responses and robotic actions into the same format, we express the actions as text tokens and incorporate them directly into the training set of the model in the same way as natural language tokens. We refer to such category of models as vision-language-action models (VLA) and instantiate an example of such a model, which we call RT-2. Our extensive evaluation (6k evaluation trials) shows that our approach leads to performant robotic policies and enables RT-2 to obtain a range of emergent capabilities from Internet-scale training. This includes significantly improved generalization to novel objects, the ability to interpret commands not present in the robot training data (such as placing an object onto a particular number or icon), and the ability to perform rudimentary reasoning in response to user commands (such as picking up the smallest or largest object, or the one closest to another object). We further show that incorporating chain of thought reasoning allows RT-2 to perform multi-stage semantic reasoning, for example figuring out which object to pick up for use as an improvised hammer (a rock), or which type of drink is best suited for someone who is tired (an energy drink).
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot Manipulation | SimplerEnv Google Robot tasks Visual Matching | Pick Coke Can Success Rate78.7 | 62 | |
| Robot Manipulation | SimplerEnv Google Robot tasks Variant Aggregation | Pick Coke Can Success Rate82.3 | 44 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | SIMPLER Google Robot Visual Matching | PickCan Success Rate78.7 | 24 | |
| Close-loop Robotics Manipulation | SimplerEnv Google Robot | Drawer Open/Close Success (VM)59.7 | 13 | |
| Close-loop Robotics Manipulation | SimplerEnv WidowX Robot | Success Rate (Spoon)0.00e+0 | 12 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Metaworld v2 (test) | Window Open Success Rate100 | 11 | |
| Close-loop Robotics Manipulation | SimplerEnv Combined | Total Average Success Rate24.6 | 11 | |
| Simulation Robotic Manipulation | SimplerEnv Google Robot setup | Horizontal Laying82.2 | 10 | |
| Quadrotor Navigation | Quadrotor Navigation (Unseen Scene) | Success Rate (SR)0.373 | 8 | |
| Quadrotor Navigation | Quadrotor Navigation (Seen Scene) | Success Rate50.1 | 8 |