Preventing Zero-Shot Transfer Degradation in Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models
About
Continual learning (CL) can help pre-trained vision-language models efficiently adapt to new or under-trained data distributions without re-training. Nevertheless, during the continual training of the Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) model, we observe that the model's zero-shot transfer ability significantly degrades due to catastrophic forgetting. Existing CL methods can mitigate forgetting by replaying previous data. However, since the CLIP dataset is private, replay methods cannot access the pre-training dataset. In addition, replaying data of previously learned downstream tasks can enhance their performance but comes at the cost of sacrificing zero-shot performance. To address this challenge, we propose a novel method ZSCL to prevent zero-shot transfer degradation in the continual learning of vision-language models in both feature and parameter space. In the feature space, a reference dataset is introduced for distillation between the current and initial models. The reference dataset should have semantic diversity but no need to be labeled, seen in pre-training, or matched image-text pairs. In parameter space, we prevent a large parameter shift by averaging weights during the training. We propose a more challenging Multi-domain Task Incremental Learning (MTIL) benchmark to evaluate different methods, where tasks are from various domains instead of class-separated in a single dataset. Our method outperforms other methods in the traditional class-incremental learning setting and the MTIL by 9.7% average score. Our code locates at https://github.com/Thunderbeee/ZSCL.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR100 10 steps | Final Step Performance73.65 | 39 | |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR100 50 steps | Last Accuracy67.36 | 36 | |
| Class-incremental learning | CIFAR100 20 steps (test) | Last Accuracy69.58 | 21 | |
| Class-incremental learning | TinyImageNet 5 steps 100 base classes (test) | Avg Score80.27 | 13 | |
| Class-incremental learning | TinyImageNet 10 steps 100 base classes (test) | Avg Accuracy78.61 | 13 | |
| Class-incremental learning | TinyImageNet 20 steps 100 base classes (test) | Average Accuracy77.18 | 13 | |
| Continual Learning | HieraMedTransfer Order I | Transfer Performance57.7 | 13 | |
| Continual Learning | MedXtreme (Order I) | ACC53.7 | 13 | |
| Continual Learning | MedXtreme (Order II) | Accuracy48.3 | 13 | |
| Continual Learning | HieraMedTransfer Order II | Transfer Score45.2 | 13 |