Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Transitivity-Preserving Graph Representation Learning for Bridging Local Connectivity and Role-based Similarity

About

Graph representation learning (GRL) methods, such as graph neural networks and graph transformer models, have been successfully used to analyze graph-structured data, mainly focusing on node classification and link prediction tasks. However, the existing studies mostly only consider local connectivity while ignoring long-range connectivity and the roles of nodes. In this paper, we propose Unified Graph Transformer Networks (UGT) that effectively integrate local and global structural information into fixed-length vector representations. First, UGT learns local structure by identifying the local substructures and aggregating features of the $k$-hop neighborhoods of each node. Second, we construct virtual edges, bridging distant nodes with structural similarity to capture the long-range dependencies. Third, UGT learns unified representations through self-attention, encoding structural distance and $p$-step transition probability between node pairs. Furthermore, we propose a self-supervised learning task that effectively learns transition probability to fuse local and global structural features, which could then be transferred to other downstream tasks. Experimental results on real-world benchmark datasets over various downstream tasks showed that UGT significantly outperformed baselines that consist of state-of-the-art models. In addition, UGT reaches the expressive power of the third-order Weisfeiler-Lehman isomorphism test (3d-WL) in distinguishing non-isomorphic graph pairs. The source code is available at https://github.com/NSLab-CUK/Unified-Graph-Transformer.

Van Thuy Hoang, O-Joun Lee• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy88.74
885
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy76.08
804
Graph ClassificationPROTEINS
Accuracy80.12
742
Node ClassificationChameleon
Accuracy69.78
549
Node ClassificationSquirrel
Accuracy66.96
500
Graph ClassificationNCI1
Accuracy77.55
460
Node ClassificationCornell
Accuracy70
426
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.8667
410
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy81.6
410
Graph ClassificationENZYMES
Accuracy67.22
305
Showing 10 of 26 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update