Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Boosting Multi-modal Model Performance with Adaptive Gradient Modulation

About

While the field of multi-modal learning keeps growing fast, the deficiency of the standard joint training paradigm has become clear through recent studies. They attribute the sub-optimal performance of the jointly trained model to the modality competition phenomenon. Existing works attempt to improve the jointly trained model by modulating the training process. Despite their effectiveness, those methods can only apply to late fusion models. More importantly, the mechanism of the modality competition remains unexplored. In this paper, we first propose an adaptive gradient modulation method that can boost the performance of multi-modal models with various fusion strategies. Extensive experiments show that our method surpasses all existing modulation methods. Furthermore, to have a quantitative understanding of the modality competition and the mechanism behind the effectiveness of our modulation method, we introduce a novel metric to measure the competition strength. This metric is built on the mono-modal concept, a function that is designed to represent the competition-less state of a modality. Through systematic investigation, our results confirm the intuition that the modulation encourages the model to rely on the more informative modality. In addition, we find that the jointly trained model typically has a preferred modality on which the competition is weaker than other modalities. However, this preferred modality need not dominate others. Our code will be available at https://github.com/lihong2303/AGM_ICCV2023.

Hong Li, Xingyu Li, Pengbo Hu, Yinuo Lei, Chunxiao Li, Yi Zhou• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Action RecognitionUCF101 (test)
Accuracy80.2
376
Action RecognitionUCF-101
Top-1 Acc81.65
225
Emotion RecognitionIEMOCAP
Accuracy72.35
151
Audio-Visual ClassificationCREMA-D (test)
Accuracy49.6
70
Emotion RecognitionCREMA-D
Overall Accuracy69.71
54
Audio-Visual Event LocalizationAVE (test)
Accuracy72.54
54
Multimodal ClassificationCREMA-D
Accuracy67.21
53
Multimodal ClassificationKS
Accuracy65.61
36
Audio-Video ClassificationKinetics-Sound
Accuracy68.88
35
Multimodal ClassificationKinetics-Sounds (test)
Multimodal Accuracy65.61
30
Showing 10 of 33 rows

Other info

Follow for update