Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting

About

Prompt learning has emerged as an efficient alternative for fine-tuning foundational models, such as CLIP, for various downstream tasks. Conventionally trained using the task-specific objective, i.e., cross-entropy loss, prompts tend to overfit downstream data distributions and find it challenging to capture task-agnostic general features from the frozen CLIP. This leads to the loss of the model's original generalization capability. To address this issue, our work introduces a self-regularization framework for prompting called PromptSRC (Prompting with Self-regulating Constraints). PromptSRC guides the prompts to optimize for both task-specific and task-agnostic general representations using a three-pronged approach by: (a) regulating prompted representations via mutual agreement maximization with the frozen model, (b) regulating with self-ensemble of prompts over the training trajectory to encode their complementary strengths, and (c) regulating with textual diversity to mitigate sample diversity imbalance with the visual branch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first regularization framework for prompt learning that avoids overfitting by jointly attending to pre-trained model features, the training trajectory during prompting, and the textual diversity. PromptSRC explicitly steers the prompts to learn a representation space that maximizes performance on downstream tasks without compromising CLIP generalization. We perform extensive experiments on 4 benchmarks where PromptSRC overall performs favorably well compared to the existing methods. Our code and pre-trained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/muzairkhattak/PromptSRC.

Muhammad Uzair Khattak, Syed Talal Wasim, Muzammal Naseer, Salman Khan, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Fahad Shahbaz Khan• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet 1k (test)
Top-1 Accuracy68.96
848
Image ClassificationImageNet A
Top-1 Acc50.9
654
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy85.8
635
Image ClassificationImageNet V2
Top-1 Acc64.35
611
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy92.43
569
Image ClassificationFlowers102
Accuracy97.6
558
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy72.73
542
Image ClassificationFood-101
Accuracy87.5
542
Image ClassificationImageNet-R
Top-1 Acc77.8
529
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy72.73
485
Showing 10 of 226 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update